Friday, 22 November 2013

Mount Merapi - Mount St.Helens Case Study



Mount Merapi


Introduction

Mount Merapi is one of Indonesia’s most active volcanoes; it is located between central java and Yogyakarta. It rises 2930m high above sea level and has been active since the 1500’s. It is approximately 28km north of Yogyakarta city where thousands of Indonesians live, many towns and villages can also be found at the base or on the volcano itself, putting the villages 1700m above sea level. Smoke can be seen from the crater for roughly 300 days of the year hence Merapi is translated as “mountain of fire”.

 

The volcano

Mount Merapi is located along a subduction zone of the Eurasian plate and the indo-Australian plate which pushes sediment up allowing magma to rise up and makes Merapi a composite/stratovolcano. It has steep sides unlike shield volcanoes and it is built from layers of fallen tephra, ash, rubble and hardened lava. The lava produced by Merapi has high-intermediate levels of silica making it very viscous and classifying it as adesitic lava, because of the high viscosity it rarely creates devastating lava flows, but as a result of that it does generate large gas build up so when it erupts it ejects a lots of ash into the atmosphere often reaching heights of 5km and radii of 30km, this often means villages as far away as 15km often get blanketed in thick ash. Occasionally lahars and mudflows can be produced because Indonesia in a country abundant with rainforest it obviously receives a lot of rainfall, creating mudflows or super-hot lahars which are a mixture of mud, water, hot ash and other debris that obliterates anything.   The high pressures also release volcanic bombs and hot gases approximately 800 Celsius, these explosive features make its eruptions Plinean, but whereas Plinean often implies infrequent eruptions Merapi differs as it erupts frequently with its most powerful eruptions having a five- ten  year gap from previous and the not so powerful occurring every other year (approximately) it has gotten much more active over the years with only a handful of eruptions in the 1800’s and over double in the 1900’s.



Positive effects of the volcano

Focusing mainly on most recent eruptions of 2010 and 2006 Merapi does generate some notable positive impacts, following the 2010 eruption the government set up and exclusion zone in the cangkringan district meaning  people in the 9 villages there were rehomed to safer locations and will protect them in the future. In 2004 6410 hectares surrounding the volcano was declared a national park this not only restricts infrastructure which would be damaged in future eruptions but also allows for recreation during clam periods. Ash from the volcano will make the volcano more fertile in the future helping the farmers produce higher crop yields; the area now notorious for volcanic activity generates tourism from volcano enthusiasts which also provides year round secure jobs for locals. Furthermore the sulphur produced from the volcano can be mined and sold despite its harmful effects on the human body and since Indonesia is developing the safety precautions won’t be as thorough so this has a negative tied to it sadly.

 

Negative effects of the volcano

Evacuation is a primary response to volcanic activity or earthquakes and this displaces thousands of residents yearly even more so in some years, in 2006 eruption 17,000 were evacuated, this is a huge inconvenience socially as it disrupts school life but also economically as business shut temporarily and income isn’t generated. The death tolls from mount Merapi’s eruptions are huge as the government isnt as well equipped to deal with the disasters as developed governments, the poor responses can sometimes put pressure on the political parties to do more or invest in better precautions and management strategies. The damage the volcano causes leaves a huge impact environmentally as the national park gets damaged, animals and their habitats destroyed and plant life killed. Furthermore economically as homes and volcanic measuring equipment is destroyed along with cars and shops too.

 

Management/prediction of eruptions

The Indonesian government along with many world scientists use Merapi for study and it therefore has a lot of equipment, seismic monitoring began in 1924 and is still carried out today. During the 50’s-60’s the stations faced starvation with equipment and monitoring was poor but improvement began a decade later. After an eruption in 1994 a station and its equipment was moved further back due to threat on the personnel. Magnetic field measuring and tilt measurement are also used as small local changes in earth’s magnetic field is seen near eruptions.

 

Managing the impacts of eruptions

These management strategies are from the largest most recent eruption of 2010, 210 evacuation centres were set up in schools, churches, stadiums or tents. 1600 people as volunteers or army aided in the national air response, international charities like the Red Cross also help with aid. Formal evacuation centres are also permanently in place as schools or stadiums might be out of use, government is providing financial relief to farmers that have livestock killed. The government has set up a special task force to deal with people suffering with family deaths or lost jobs and destroyed property.

Mount St.Helens

 
Introduction

Mount St.helens is located in skamania country, Washington, USA.  Before its infamous 1980 eruption it was the 5th highest peak in Washington at a height of 1500m, but it is now only 1300m on its north-eastern face and 1200m elsewhere, before 1980 its cone was 4 miles wide. Mount st.helens is 96 miles south of Seattle, Washington and 50 miles north of Portland, Oregon. Mount st.helens is part of the famous pacific ring of fire, and due to its extensive snow cover during winter it is often nicknamed the “Fuji-san” of America.



The volcano

Mount st.helens is also located along a subduction zone of the Juan del fuca plate and the North American plate which pushes sediment up high allowing magma to rise up from the asthenosphere and makes st.helens a composite/stratovolcano. It also has steep sides and it is built from layers of fallen tephra, ash, rubble and hardened lava. The lava produced by st.helens has high-intermediate levels of silica making it very viscous and classifying it as andesitic lava, because of the relatively high viscosity it is unlikely to create devastating lava flows, but as a result of that it does generate large gas build up so when it erupts it ejects a lots of ash into the atmosphere and creates deadly pyroclastic flows as it did with the famous 1980 eruption.  Mount st.helens is a very young volcano and only formed within the last 40,000 years, it very rarely erupts and its last huge eruption was 3500 years ago. It exhibited volcanic activity in 1800 and a few times in early 1900’s but no major eruptions and being that its latest eruption was 2008 which was very small it has a very high eruption frequency of about 100-150 years for considerable eruptions. Due to the fact Mount st Helens goes off over large periods of times the features of the eruption are deadly with rock, ash, steam and gases ejected at speeds above 300mph, lahars often appear in the rivers surrounding st.helens as the hot ash gets into the streams and travels long distances at speeds of 50mph wiping out anything in its path.


Positive effects of the volcano

Referring to the 1980 eruption, scientists discovered after entering the blast zones which were wiped flat and layered in ash that species that burrowed underground and sheltered in small ridges, beetles were one of the first animals to begin to colonize the area again and the landscape has been reset for colonization of animal and plant life again. The study showed that some animals (mainly insects) have the ability to survive in the harshest of climates. The abundance of ash increased the fertility of soil and in fact the area returned to normal state much quicker than scientists expected, which could be due to the fertility of the soil. Lastly the eruption has now released the volcano of huge pressures so we can be certain that a devastating eruption like that is unlikely to happen in our lifetimes.

 

Negative effects of the eruption

The eruption killed 57 people which doesn’t put such a toll on the local economy but can affect the social lives of select few radically, the damages caused by the eruption costed in total nearly $1 billion which would put massive impact on local economy as bridges over the river toutle had to be rebuilt costing $145 million, furthermore shipping in the Colombia river was stopped this effected local economies elsewhere too, the same was for the highways as well, up to 5000 motorists ha to abandon their cars. The environment was the biggest loser in all this as 12million salmon were killed by lahars and ash in the river, 7000 big game, and nearly all life in the direct blast zone was destroyed and those in the sear zone would have habitat destroyed and food supplies gone and with no safe drinking water the animals would have starved if the survived the eruption.

 

Management/prediction of eruptions

An exclusion zone was set up the march of the eruption in May 1980, with red zones allowing no body to enter and blue allowing access for farmers, the volcano is constantly monitored by the USGS for activity in which to warn nearby residents. Geodetic networks are set up to measure the changing shape of the volcanoes’ surface caused by pressure and magma builds up. Electronic distance measurements, tilt measurements and standard levelling surveying are used to measure change in the elevation and also looking for cracks or openings. Measurements in magnetic fields, electrical conductivity and gravity are also used to predict an eruption, changes in fumaroles or S02 are noted as they can indicate lava activity. Changes in groundwater and levels are used to detect groundwater’s role in predicting/ generating eruptions.

 

Managing the impacts of eruptions

 The National Guard flew helicopter missions up to two weeks after the eruption rescuing people in the blast zone and elsewhere, they saved 130 people. Clean water, food supplies and medical equipment was issued by the US government and charities. 2 million gas masks were handed out to protect people from breathing in ash and asphyxiating or to protect rescuers and charities from the poisonous S02 that was released. The ash was cleaned up from all the towns using diggers, sweepers and trucks and all the ash was gone from town areas within 3 days.

Wednesday, 20 November 2013

Geography - lagos

Intro

Lagos is a nigerian city located on the southcoast of nigeria, the city is located in an area of lagons, sandbars and islands and is therefroe a natural harbour. Lagos grew from a port city to become the capital of nigeria up until 1983, the capital was then re-located to abuja. From 1890-1930 Lagos's population grew from 10000 to 1.5 million, population growth slowed from 1930-1960 but from 1960-1999 the population thundered from 1.5 million to 11.4  million. It is estimated that Lagos will have a population of 24.4 million in 2050 making it in th etop 5 worlds largest city, this is the root cause of the problems Lagos is facing and will face.

Problems

Due to the sheer size of Lagos and its population its infrastructure has become vastly overwhelmed, with heavy traffic nicknamed 'go slows' becoming frequent. The heavy traffic aggravates the environment chocking the air with car fumes. A lack of free government education in the slum areas of the city such as makoko has resulted in lots of private schools where the children pay an adult to teach, unlikely to be qualified to teach the children are receiving a poor education. Only 3/10 people in the city can afford to pay for electricity but a lot of people don't pay anyway as electricity supply is poor so only 2 hours per day has successful electricity, the reason for the lack of electricity is people not paying enough to the supplier, an endless cycle. 65% of Lagos's income is generated from illegal work such as street vendors who use the "go slows" to their advantage, other people who in-migrate in search of work often enter the illegal trade as there is a shortage of jobs.

Solutions

One way the government in Lagos is trying to solve its problems is introducing bus routes, these bypass the "go slows" in dedicated bus lanes and reduce CO2 by 40%. a special task force has been assigned to stop the illegal trade and find jobs for the migrants. The city of Lagos is also providing mortgages to people so they can work to buying a house to home their families, the Government is also building temporary housing for the residents in the slums or those illegal traders re-located whilst they search for formal employment. The recycling dumps allows access to the public, the residents use this chance to either improve or build a house in the slums or sell it to a vendor, illegally of course, and make easy money.

Comment on the solutions

I feel the bus routes are a hugely successful idea as this greatly reduces traffic, reduces CO2, more time efficient for those who usually walked and for those who couldn't drive due to financial constraint, furthermore it also provides a strong source of income for the city plus jobs and more buses will be able to be used in the future. However the bus routes does mean re designing he roads which will cause a lot of traffic and with the roads in Lagos already dangerous this may create extra hazards and road casualties. The task force assigned to wipe out the illegal trade will wipe out 65% of Lagos's income, enough said really as Lagos cant re locate or provide formal work for those who worked illegally and therefore they are shooting themselves in the foot as 65% loss in income is huge for a developing city. The providing of mortgages is a good idea as it will help to rehome those families that have the money, and doing it gradual repayments wont put lots of stress on the resident, however a lot of Lagos cant afford a mortgage and giving one to a person who has no knowledge of a mortgage will fall into huge financial difficulty.


  In what way does rapid urbanisation help and hinder development into a World City? (20 marks)

A World city acts as a major hub for world finance; trade, business, politics and culture, in essence the city serves the world, the term world city was coined by a man called peter hall. Early twentieth century London was in the same ball park as the developing world today and it was facing rapid urbanisation form the rural areas of the country, people in rural counties like Devon and Cornwall to name a few left the farming and mining life which was rife in those areas at the time to head for the city which held the hopes of many as a prosperous future, with more money and services. This emigration for the countryside left farming lacking labourers and development of machinery soon came to place; this pushed remaining farm workers away. Not just farmers left for the city, the young left to make a living and one day return with money to provide for their families like the developing world is doing today in Lagos. The influx of people into 20th century London put huge pressure on the housing conditions and people lived in squalor, sewage was the streets and the streets were sewage. People where closely packed and pollution was chocking people. However over ther next 100 years events like the two world wars generated an economic boom in production, the city became the place to be, London further grew into a world city as more and more business arrived. The city grew financially, political power was then strong and influenecial to other parts of the world.

Rapid urbanisation today can be seen in the developed world in cities like Lagos, Lagos is located in southern Nigeria, and it used to be the capital up until 1983 when the title was given away to Abuja. From 1890-1930 the population grew from 10000 to 1.5 million, by 1960-1999 population grew from 1.5 million to 11.4 million. By 2050 Lagos is estimated to reach 24.5 million making it in the top 5 world largest cities. The reason Lagos is growing so rapidly is that Nigeria is developing, although it has oil it is still stage 2 in the DTM, due to Nigeria being poor it lacks resources of all kinds, so most economic activity concentrates in one place and all the people head there. Furthermore large parts of Africa is facing unpredictable weather with battering droughts, this forces villagers who rely on farming to move to the city where there is hopes of food, work and other services.

People are pushed from the countryside rapidly due to the machinery in farming just like 20th century farmers in England faced, but since technology doesn’t need to be invented it arrives quicker, thus pushing labourers away. Because Lagos is so big lots of government attention is overlooked in rural areas and any development seems to concentrate in urban areas, this causes decline of the infrastructure and services. The over excessive oil drilling has scarred the land forcing people to be moved as they live above oil or that oil is polluting their crops. Lagos provides some very attractive incentives to the rural Nigerian, 70% of industrial investment is focused in Lagos which will create jobs short and long term. The oil production has increased 7-fold during 1965-1973, this meant Lagos contributed to 40% of Nigeria’s oil trade. 90% of people in Lagos have access to electricity even though it is unreliable people don’t really care as in the rural villages electricity wasn’t available at all. Lagos has the highest literacy rates in the country so the expectation of better education is desired by the migrant.  Government initiatives like bus routes allow good access around the city whilst reducing carbon emissions and avoiding he traffic, a dream for migrants who have to find jobs far from their home. All these push factors from the rural areas and pull factors to Lagos drive the rapid urbanisation, but can Lagos keep up?

 

Rapid urbanisation does hinder development into a world city; it can be seen through factors such as the competition for jobs, large amounts of the city aren’t pushing towards formal work then companies will struggle to make money hence the county can’t develop economically. In 1999 official unemployment was 28%, this forces people to work illegally and doesn’t help the country to develop economically, yes illegal work contributes to the economy but it can’t be relied on and as more on more people arrive each day formal work is in short supply. The culture of certain groups such as Yoruba society sees women as inferior and easier to exploit, the way some women are exploited in the work places sees a lack of female workers, a world city defines a vivid culture and if women are being mass exploited and ignored in the work place that doesn’t help to develop into a world city.

However the rapid population does help develop a city into a world city, a sort of proof is looking at the history of cities like London, Paris, New York, they all struggled to get to the stage they are now. There is no set plan to becoming a world city due to many external factors like world economy or the climate and location of the city. Lagos has the advantage of being a port city with lots of oil wealth, as oil prices rise the Nigerians will become richer, this will allow for developments in housing and creating business opportunities. With aid from developed country plus the oil wealth the electricity will become more reliable and distribution of clean water will be more readily available reducing damage to health and improved quality of life. The vast population will be able make government initiatives such as the bus routes an economic success and will allow for more improvements in infrastructure as an example, this improvement will reduce traffic potentially increasing work efficiency and giving working people more time at home to cook or go out. As the city grows larger and larger tourist industry may spark with more adventurous tourists visiting such a huge city, the same may happen for businesses. Shops May quickly become supermarkets due to sheer number of people entering the shop to buy stuff, supermarkets may then grow to huge franchises this will provide jobs and economic growth for the government. Lastly as more and more people arrive the culture diversifies, yes the sexism needs to be sorted but the mix of religions and beliefs creates a vibrant culture.

To conclude I feel rapid urbanisation does more to help a city become a world city; this can be seen largely as history providing the best example with all the world cities today going through the rough stages of the DTM, to growing in size and struggling to the powerhouses they are now. Furthermore more people create an incentive for international business to move in, diversifies the culture, the city has large political influence because it houses so many people. Although the city struggles to get education to all the children and the infrastructure is bursting at the seams, unique government initiatives like bus routes and recycling dumps allows people free access to trade the treasures they find or upgrade their homes with unwanted metals and plastics. Furthermore with the developing world able to provide help through finances, charity or business opportunities it gives Lagos the upper hand.   The rapid urbanisation does hinder the path to become a world city yes, sheer volume of people puts massive strains on the infrastructure and housing industry, social tension can rise between long term residents and new migrants this could cause problems with crime or political unrest. But I do feel rapid urbanisation helps more than hinder on the path to becoming a world city, yet there is no definite path so Lagos is neither right nor wrong in its advance to become the world city it is slowly becoming.